|
|
|
|
|
Resources for Educators
The Center
is frequently asked by instructors and
professors for information to assist them in
developing a lecture or discussion group on long
distance relationships. Often these are
Introduction to Interpersonal Relations
classes in the departments of psychology,
sociology, or communication. We provide a
lesson plan / syllabus designed for college
level classes (although with some modifications
may be appropriate for high school). This
presentation is available in
HTML,
PDF, or
PowerPoint
presentation.
You may also want to check out
recent research
on long distance couples or see our recent
news
releases.
The Center
for the Study of Long Distance Relationships
and JF Milne Publications grants
permission for instructors and professors to
reproduce the information on this website,
including the PowerPoint presentations for the
sole purpose of education or research.
Reproduction of any material for the purpose
of sales or profit is not permitted. |
|
|
|
|
Long Distance Relationships
An
Introduction to Geographically Separated
Couples
Gregory Guldner, MD, MS
Director,
The Center for the Study of Long
Distance Relationships
Goals
¨
Develop a
basic understanding of long distance
relationships
¨
Dispel
common myths about long distance
relationships
¨
Learn some
simple techniques to support those in
LDRs
Objectives
¨
Understand
LDRs:
Defining LDRs
Prevalence of LDRs
Do LDRs work?
Difficulties with LDRs
Advantages of LDRs
¨
Support for
those in LDRs
Understanding LDRs
¨
Understand
Defining LDRs
Prevalence of LDRs
Do LDRs work?
Difficulties with LDRs
Advantages of LDRs
Defining an
LDR
¨
Specific
distance cut-off
¨
Specific
location cut-off
¨
Self-defining
My partner lives far enough away from
me that it would be very difficult or
impossible for us to see one another
every day.
Understanding LDRs
¨
Understand
Defining LDRs
Prevalence of LDRs
Do LDRs work?
Difficulties with LDRs
Advantages of LDRs
Prevalence
of LDRs
¨
Marital
LDRs
¨
Pre-Marital
College Student
National
Longitudinal Study of the High School
Class of 1972
¨
3.31% of
7191 married respondents were living in
a different location than spouse
¨
Of military
marriages 27% of White and 63% of
African-American couples were living
apart.
¨
10% of all
job relocations result in long distance
marriages (1998) and 52% of employers
expect transfers to increase.
Pre-Marital
LDRs
¨
College
Students
¨
Internet
Dating
¨
Military
¨
Certain
Industries
Oil
Fishing
Logging
¨
College
Students
25-40% (1993)
50% of First Years (1992)
33% (1987)
25% at any given time and 78% at any
point (1996)
Understanding LDRs
¨
Understand
Defining LDRs
Prevalence of LDRs
Do LDRs work?
Difficulties with LDRs
Advantages of LDRs
Do LDRs Work?
¨
Marriage or
Pre-Marital?
¨
Military /
combat or Civilian?
¨
What does
it mean to work?
Continuity (break-up rate over time)
Quality (satisfaction, intimacy, etc)
Do LDRs
Break-up More Frequently than PRs?
¨
Pre-marital
studies have found no greater rate of
dissolution in LDRs than PRs
Guldner. J. College Student Dev,
1996;37;289-295
Van Horn, et al. Personal Relationships,
1997;4;25-34
Stafford & Reske. Family Relations,
1990;39;274-279
Stephen. Journal of Divorce, 1984;8;1-17
¨
No adequate
data on marital LDRs
Rindfuss & Stephen. J. Marriage and the
Family, 1990;52;259-270.
Do LDRs
Have Poorer Quality Relationships Than
Do PRs?
¨
The
majority of studies show no differences
between LDRs and PRs on measures of
Satisfaction
Intimacy
Trust
Commitment
¨
Guldner &
Swensen, J. Social Personal Rel.
1995;12;313-320
¨
Govaerts &
Dixon. Int. J. Adv. Counseling.
1988l;11;265-281
¨
Stafford &
Reske. Family Relations,
1990;39;274-279
¨
Woelfel &
Savell. Military Families.
1978;17-31
¨
Gerstel &
Gross. Commuter Marriage. 1984.
¨
Stephen.
Human Com Res. 1986; 13;191-210
¨
Delmann-Jenkins,
et al. College Stud J.
1994;28;212-219
¨
Timmerman.
Doctoral Thesis. U. of Texas. 2001.
Understanding LDRs
¨
Understand
Defining LDRs
Prevalence of LDRs
Do LDRs work?
Difficulties with LDRs
Advantages of LDRs
Difficulties Associated with LDRs
¨
The
Individual
Depression
Military Separations
Clinical Depression
Civilian
Guldner, GT. Long Distance Romantic
Relationships: Prevalence and
Separation-related Symptoms. J
College Student Development, 1996;
37; 289-295.
Clinical Depression no more likely in
LDR than in PR
Minor Depressive symptoms common
Feeling blue, lack of interest,
difficulty making decisions, difficulty
concentrating
Difficulties Associated with LDRs
¨
The
Individual
Anxiety
Uncertainty
Jealousy / Sexual Affairs
Dis-inhibition (loss of support)
Guilt
Violating norms
Choice of career over relationship
Emotional rollercoaster
Difficulties Associated with LDRs
¨
The
Relationship
Myths (Dissolution, Quality, Finances)
Relationship momentum slowed
Progress toward marriage more slowly
Break-up more slowly
Idealization and Disillusionment
Difficulties in Communication
Sexuality at a Distance
Re-integration
Assessment of the Status of the
Relationship
Understanding LDRs
¨
Understand
Defining LDRs
Prevalence of LDRs
Do LDRs work?
Difficulties with LDRs
Advantages of LDRs
Advantages of an LDR
¨
Individual
Productivity
¨
Novelty
Avoids the taken-for-granted aspect of
PRs
Plan exciting activities
¨
Compartmentalization
Intimacy / autonomy fulfillment
¨
Idealization
Demographics
¨
Easily
measured components of LDR (distance,
duration, frequency of visits, etc)
¨
Not very
important
¨
Frequency
of face-to-face visits not correlated
with satisfaction
¨
Frequency
of telephone calls negatively correlated
with satisfaction
¨
Frequency
of letters predicts satisfaction
Support for
those in LDRs
¨
Types of
Support
Emotional
Appraisal
Informational
Instrumental
¨
Sources of
Support
Partner
Family
Friends
Context
Supporting LDRs
¨
Emotional
Stages of Separation
¨
Staying
Emotionally Healthy
¨
Maintaining
Intimacy
¨
Frequency
of Contact
¨
Hellos &
Goodbyes
¨
Conflict at
a Distance
¨
Long
Distance Sex
¨
Sexual
Affairs
¨
Dating
Others
¨
Gender
Differences in Separation
Supporting
LDRs:
Understanding Separation
¨
Emotional
Stages of Separation
Bowlby / Animal Studies / Evolutionary
Psych
Protest (Anger, Bargaining)
Despair (Depression to various degrees)
Detachment (Productive or Destructive)
Kubler-Ross
Denial and Isolation
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance
Supporting LDRs
¨
Emotional
Stages of Separation
¨
Staying
Emotionally Healthy
¨
Maintaining
Intimacy
¨
Frequency
of Contact
¨
Hellos &
Goodbyes
¨
Conflict at
a Distance
¨
Long
Distance Sex
¨
Sexual
Affairs
¨
Dating
Others
¨
Gender
Differences in Separation
Supporting
LDRs: Staying Emotionally Healthy
Ten Step Program
¨
Maintain a
satisfying relationship
¨
Socialize
¨
Emotional
vs. Social Loneliness
¨
Find a
Confidant
¨
Touching
¨
Take
Control
¨
Positive
Thinking / Reframing
¨
View the
Separation as Temporary
¨
Acknowledge
Contributions
¨
Transitional Objects
¨
Healthy
Sexuality
Supporting
LDRs
¨
Emotional
Stages of Separation
¨
Staying
Emotionally Healthy
¨
Maintaining
Intimacy
¨
Frequency
of Contact
¨
Hellos &
Goodbyes
¨
Conflict at
a Distance
¨
Long
Distance Sex
¨
Sexual
Affairs
¨
Dating
Others
¨
Gender
Differences in Separation
Supporting
an LDR: Keys to Maintaining Intimacy
¨
Intimacy
Components
Emotional Sharing
Interrelatedness
¨
Emotional
Sharing
LDRs may do this more easily than PRs
¨
Interrelatedness
Central Issue for LDR Intimacy
Focus on the mundane
Serial vs. Parallel Communication
Supporting
LDRs
¨
Emotional
Stages of Separation
¨
Staying
Emotionally Healthy
¨
Maintaining
Intimacy
¨
Frequency
of Contact
¨
Hellos &
Goodbyes
¨
Conflict at
a Distance
¨
Long
Distance Sex
¨
Sexual
Affairs
¨
Dating
Others
¨
Gender
Differences in Separation
Supporting an LDR: Contact
¨
Face-to-face visits
Conflicting research
Opinion suggests at least once a month
Early studies had design issues
Carpenter & Knox. College Student J.1986;
28:86-88
Failed vs. successful; contact related
for men only
Holt & Stone. J College Student Dev.
1988; 29:136-141
Definition of LDR
Groves & Horm-Wingerd. Soc Social
Res. 1991;75:212-216
Outcome happier with relationship
¨
Larger
studies & longitudinal studies
No correlation or impact of frequency of
face-to-face visits for continuity or
quality or relationship
Guldner & Swensen, J. Social Personal
Rel. 1995;12;313-320
Schwebel, et al. J. College Student
Dev. 1992; 33:222-230
Guldner. Purdue Univ, Dept. of Psych.
1992
¨
Strategies
based on increasing visits likely will
not work any frequency okay
Supporting
an LDR: Contact
¨
Telephone
Calls
No evidence to suggest positive
correlation or threshold effect
Frequency may be negatively correlated
More calls more conflict?
More conflict more calls?
Supporting
an LDR: Contact
¨
Writing
Letters.
Cross-sectional.
Strong correlation between frequency of
letters and relationship quality.
Longitudinal.
Couples who stayed together wrote one
another almost twice as often as those
who broke-up.
Measures of relationship quality
identical at time-one.
Supporting
an LDR: Contact
¨
Writing
Letters
Peculiarities of Letters
Transitional objects
Tangible
Re-readable
Scent
Generally conveys mostly positive
messages
Pre-stamp and address envelopes to
facilitate letter writing
Discuss the mundane if writing is only
contact
Supporting
LDRs
¨
Emotional
Stages of Separation
¨
Staying
Emotionally Healthy
¨
Maintaining
Intimacy
¨
Frequency
of Contact
¨
Hellos &
Goodbyes
¨
Conflict at
a Distance
¨
Long
Distance Sex
¨
Sexual
Affairs
¨
Dating
Others
¨
Gender
Differences in Separation
Supporting
a | | | | |